Community, Housing, and Homelessness Policy

> Back to Plan Hub

Summary
• More housing delivered faster, fewer people living unsheltered, and safer public spaces with transparent results.
• Where it helps or who benefits: Major metros, mid-sized cities, and small towns, plus residents, businesses, and people experiencing homelessness.
• What makes it accountable or measurable: Five-year targets, public dashboards, independent verification, pilot-first funding, and automatic sunsets if programs miss goals.

Guiding principles
• Deliver measurable results with fiscal discipline, independent audits, and public dashboards.
• Expand housing supply at scale while protecting local voice, safety, labor standards, and anti-displacement guardrails.
• Pair compassion with public order by aligning outreach, housing availability, and rights-protecting enforcement.

Goals
• 200,000 new or converted housing units statewide within five years
• 50% reduction in unsheltered homelessness in major metros within five years
• 30% reduction in chronic homelessness statewide within five years
• 90-day average permitting timeline for eligible housing
• 72-hour connection to care following street outreach engagement
• 25% reduction in homelessness-related ER cycling

Plan & Policy

I. Housing Surge: Speed, Scale, Local Control
Goals:
• Increase housing supply at urban scale without overriding community voice
• Reduce cost and delay through standardized pathways while keeping design authority local
Actions:
• Convert vacant offices, hotels, and commercial properties in major cities through adaptive reuse
• Deploy modular and prefab housing for rapid metro-scale expansion
• Use pre-approved standardized designs to reduce cost and delay
• Deliver 90-day approvals for projects that meet clear eligibility criteria
• Deploy State-city Housing Surge Teams to major metros to unblock permitting and delivery
• Offer opt-in zoning tools and participatory local review boards
• Use performance-based funding incentives instead of blanket mandates
• Include cooperative ownership, nonprofit stewardship, or land trusts in 20–30% of projects
• Match community crowdfunding with state grants
• Require transparent per-unit cost reporting
Impacts:
• More units delivered faster with clearer timelines and lower soft costs
• Communities retain design voice while permitting becomes predictable
• Reduced displacement risk through mitigation requirements and transparency

II. Affordable Housing Durability, Access, and Pathways to Ownership
Goals:
• Ensure affordable housing remains affordable for decades, not short compliance windows
• Expand access for first responders, frontline workers, and low-income households
• Create clear pathways from affordable rental housing into sustainable homeownership
Actions:
• Establish a statewide long-term affordability standard that prioritizes 30 to 55 year affordability covenants, with incentives for permanent affordability where feasible
• Require clear public reporting of affordability duration for every state-supported project
• Work with local jurisdictions to standardize and strengthen inclusionary housing rules, which currently vary widely across California
• Prioritize mixed-income developments so affordable units are integrated with market-rate housing and have equal access to amenities, consistent with state fair housing direction
• Expand targeted workforce housing set-asides for first responders, healthcare workers, teachers, and other frontline workers in high-cost regions
• Create a “rent-to-ownership” and shared-equity pilot that allows qualified residents of affordable units to transition toward ownership over time
• Provide down payment assistance and credit-building supports tied to stable tenancy history in regulated affordable housing
• Support community land trusts and limited-equity cooperatives to preserve long-term affordability and prevent speculative loss
• Align affordable housing investments with climate-resilient construction standards, including heat, wildfire, flood, and backup power readiness
• Require resilience retrofits for publicly supported affordable housing in high-risk climate zones
• Close common loopholes such as excessive in-lieu fee reliance where it reduces on-site affordable production
Impacts:
• Affordable units remain accessible to working families for decades instead of short compliance periods
• Greater housing stability for first responders, frontline workers, and low-income residents
• Increased transition from renting to ownership for qualified households
• Reduced long-term displacement risk in high-cost metros
• Stronger climate resilience for vulnerable residents

III. Stability Infrastructure and Low-Barrier Access
Goals:
• Remove administrative and logistical barriers that prolong homelessness
• Lower long-term system costs by shortening time spent homeless
Actions:
• Provide free ID replacement and temporary starter ID
• Deploy mobile ID and service units in dense urban areas and rural regions
• Provide state-supported mailing access and digital mail scanning
• Expand hygiene infrastructure with fixed and mobile showers, restrooms, and laundry
• Provide employment clothing vouchers
• Offer free or subsidized transit for job-seeking and stabilization
• Provide phones and data access as essential infrastructure
• Create one-stop stabilization hubs in major metros
Impacts:
• Faster access to services, jobs, and benefits that support housing stability
• Reduced fragmentation that increases costs and delays
• Improved follow-through from outreach to stabilization

IIV. Public Space Restoration and Encampment Resolution
Goals:
• Restore safe, accessible public spaces while protecting civil rights
• Resolve encampments in a way that follows verified capacity, not empty promises
Actions:
• Coordinate encampment resolution with verified housing availability
• Set time-bound plans that are publicly reported
• Pair actions with immediate service offers
• Require civil rights compliance in operations and reporting
• Deploy state-city response teams in major metros to integrate rapid modular housing, behavioral health surge staffing, and service coordination
• Ensure enforcement follows capacity and does not precede it
Impacts:
• Reduced long-term encampment persistence with public reporting
• Greater predictability and fairness because actions follow verified options
• Improved public confidence through transparency and compliance

V. Health and Behavioral Care Alignment
Goals:
• Align housing stability with access to mental health and addiction care
• Ensure rapid follow-up after outreach contact
Actions:
• Expand housing-linked outpatient mental health and addiction services
• Increase psychiatric and peer support workforce through loan forgiveness
• Deploy mobile medical teams in major metros
• Expand CARE Court capacity tied to verified housing availability
• Ensure 72-hour follow-up after outreach contact
• Maintain a clear rule that no one is required to accept treatment to receive housing
Impacts:
• More consistent care pathways that support long-term stability
• Increased capacity that matches housing scale
• Stronger trust because housing access is not conditioned on treatment acceptance

VI. Work, Skills and Economic Stability
Goals:
• Reduce homelessness by increasing economic attachment and employment stability
• Reduce inflow through prevention supports
Actions:
• Integrate on-site employment pipelines into housing developments
• Expand paid apprenticeships in construction, energy retrofits, and civic tech
• Create stackable credentials tied to housing and infrastructure projects
• Provide transportation and clothing supports for job placement
• Track employment retention outcomes publicly
• Expand prevention programs such as rent stabilization support, eviction intervention, and utility assistance
Impacts:
• Higher employment uptake and retention for people exiting homelessness
• Lower inflow into homelessness through targeted prevention supports
• Clear public reporting on outcomes beyond placements

VII. Climate-Resilient Urban Infrastructure
Goals:
• Ensure housing and shelter capacity withstand climate risk
• Prevent disasters from creating long-term homelessness
Actions:
• Retrofit housing for wildfire, heat, and flood resilience
• Expand microgrids in dense urban areas and small communities
• Align disaster recovery funding with resilience standards
• Pre-position modular emergency housing that can convert to transitional use
Impacts:
• Reduced displacement and shelter disruption during climate events
• Faster recovery with housing options that can scale quickly
• Increased reliability for essential services through microgrids

VIII. Governance, Metrics and Fiscal Discipline
Goals:
• Spend smarter with clear ROI and accountability
• Reward performance and end programs that do not work
Actions:
• Require ROI modeling for major initiatives
• Establish independent fiscal oversight and audits
• Set cost-per-unit benchmarks and publish them
• Maintain public dashboards with progress reporting and independent verification
• Use automatic program sunsets for underperforming initiatives
• Grant cities that meet performance targets expanded flexibility and funding
• Restructure or end programs that fail to deliver
Impacts:
• Reduced waste and better outcomes per dollar spent
• Incentives shift toward delivery and measurable impact
• Public trust improves through transparency and verification

Safeguards
• How rights and civil liberties are protected:
- Civil rights compliance requirements for outreach and encampment resolution, immediate service offers paired with verified housing availability, and a clear rule that treatment is not required to receive housing.
- Fair housing compliance is required so affordable and workforce units are integrated and access is nondiscriminatory.
• Risk checks, transparency, audits: Independent audits, independent verification of results, public dashboards, transparent per-unit cost reporting, ROI modeling, and public reporting of affordability duration for every state-supported affordable housing project, including covenants and any conversion or resale restrictions.
• Rollback or pause triggers: Automatic sunset for underperforming programs, restructuring or termination when benchmarks are missed, scaling only after pilots meet targets, and pause triggers if affordability duration commitments are shortened, if units are lost from affordability restrictions faster than they are replaced, or if cost-per-unit and timeline benchmarks materially exceed published thresholds without justification.

• FAQs

  How will you reduce unsheltered homelessness without breaking community trust?
  By pairing outreach and service offers with verified housing availability, using low-barrier stabilization supports that remove practical barriers, and requiring civil rights compliance for encampment resolution. The plan also protects community voice through opt-in zoning tools, local review boards, and design authority within standardized frameworks.

  How does the 90-day permitting goal work without overriding local control?
  The 90-day goal applies to projects that meet clear eligibility criteria and use standardized, pre-approved pathways. Cities retain design authority within standardized frameworks, and participation is supported through performance-based funding incentives rather than blanket mandates.

  What counts as “eligible housing” for faster approvals?
  Projects that meet clear, published eligibility criteria, including standardized designs and compliance requirements, qualify for the accelerated pathway. The purpose is predictable timelines with measurable performance.

  How will you prevent waste and ensure spending produces real results?
  Each major initiative includes clear performance metrics, independent audits, public dashboards, pilot-first funding, ROI modeling, and cost-per-unit benchmarks. Programs that underperform are restructured or ended, and initiatives have automatic sunset provisions if targets are not met.

  Where will the 200,000 units come from?
  From a mix of adaptive reuse of vacant offices, hotels, and commercial properties in major cities, plus rapid deployment of modular and prefab housing. The plan also uses pre-approved standardized designs, 90-day approvals for eligible projects, and State-city Housing Surge Teams to speed delivery.

  How will adaptive reuse of offices and hotels be made safe and livable?
  By requiring full labor, safety, and environmental compliance, maintaining transparent per-unit cost reporting, and using standardized designs and rules that reduce delays without cutting corners. Cities keep design authority within the standardized framework so conversions fit local needs.

  How does this plan strengthen affordable housing, not just overall housing supply?
  It adds an affordability durability standard with longer affordability covenants, requires public reporting of affordability duration for state-supported projects, strengthens inclusionary approaches with local partnership, expands workforce set-asides, and supports long-term affordability models like land trusts and limited-equity cooperatives.

  How will you make sure affordable units stay affordable long-term?
  By prioritizing long affordability covenants, requiring clear reporting of affordability duration, and tying state support to transparent, enforceable affordability commitments. The plan also uses dashboards and independent oversight so the public can track whether affordability is being preserved.

  How does the plan support first responders, frontline workers, and low-income households?
  By expanding targeted workforce housing set-asides in high-cost regions, integrating affordable units into mixed-income projects, and pairing housing with practical stabilization supports like transit, IDs, and job access tools, so people can keep housing once they have it.

  Is there a path from affordable housing into homeownership?
  Yes. The plan proposes rent-to-ownership and shared-equity pilots, down payment assistance, and credit-building supports tied to stable tenancy history. It also supports community land trusts and limited-equity cooperatives that preserve affordability while enabling ownership-like stability.

  How will this plan address mental health and addiction needs?
  By expanding housing-linked outpatient mental health and addiction services, deploying mobile medical teams, increasing psychiatric and peer support workforce capacity through loan forgiveness, and expanding CARE Court capacity tied to verified housing availability. The plan also requires a 72-hour follow-up after outreach contact.

  Will people be required to accept treatment to receive housing?
  No. The plan explicitly states no one will be required to accept treatment to receive housing. At the same time, it scales treatment capacity to match housing delivery so services are available for people who want or need them.

  How will encampments be resolved while protecting civil rights?
  Encampment resolution is coordinated with verified housing availability, time-bound, and publicly reported, with immediate service offers and civil rights compliance required. Enforcement follows capacity, not the other way around, and state-city response teams support major metros with rapid housing and service integration.

  How will affordable housing hold up to climate risks and disasters?
  The plan aligns affordable housing investments with climate-resilient standards, requires resilience retrofits for publicly supported affordable housing in high-risk zones, expands microgrids, and pre-positions modular emergency housing that can convert to transitional use. The goal is to prevent disasters from creating long-term homelessness.

  How will this work for small towns and rural areas?
  Through scalable modular design, mobile service delivery, and regional hub-and-spoke stabilization centers that can serve smaller populations efficiently. The plan also includes microgrid designs optimized for small communities and performance-based funding that applies across all community sizes.

  What happens if the numbers do not improve?
  Programs that fail to meet benchmarks are restructured or ended. The plan includes automatic program sunsets for underperforming initiatives, independent fiscal oversight, and public dashboards so the public can see what is working and what is not, and funding can shift to approaches that deliver measurable results.

> Back to Plan Hub

Related Plans & Policies